Teaching Notes · Economic Development and Growth

Economic Development and Growth

Core Theory and Measurement

Comparative Development and the Global Context

Behind the Numbers: Production, Costs, and a Country's Output

Before we can talk meaningfully about growth, inequality, or unemployment, it helps to be precise about where output actually comes from, and what it costs to produce it. This piece covers the basic building blocks: what capital means in modern economics, how a country's total output is determined, and how economists measure the cost of producing one more unit of something.

What counts as capital

Economists in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries typically listed three factors of production: capital, labor, and land. Modern economic theory usually simplifies this to two broad factors, capital and labor, while taking a much broader view of what capital actually includes. Alongside physical capital, machines, factories, equipment, modern economics treats the acquired skills of workers as human capital. Increases in human capital raise output in the same way that increases in physical capital do, and both require upfront investment, tuition and forgone wages in the case of a student, new machinery and forgone current profit in the case of a firm, in exchange for higher income later. By some estimates, human capital now accounts for more than half of a country's total capital stock, which is one reason education and training sit so close to the center of development economics.

Once human capital is built into the picture, a country's production function, the relationship describing how inputs become output, can be written roughly as output equals a function of capital and effective labor, where effective labor is the number of workers multiplied by their skill and efficiency. A more skilled workforce produces more output even holding the raw number of workers constant.

What determines a country's total output

At the broadest level, a country's total output depends on how much capital and labor the economy has, and the level of technology available to combine them. That output then gets used in three main ways: consumption, which depends on households' disposable income; investment, which depends on the real interest rate; and government spending, which is largely set by policy rather than by market forces. The real interest rate is the price that balances the economy's overall supply of loanable funds with the demand for them, and by extension helps balance the supply of goods and services with the demand for them.

The production possibility frontier, revisited

The Production Possibility Frontier introduced in the first piece in this series rests on a few simplifying assumptions worth stating plainly: that the economy produces only two goods, that all available resources are fully employed, that the quantity and quality of those resources stay constant, and that the technology in use is fixed. Under those assumptions, the frontier shifts outward, representing more total output being possible, only through technological change or an increase in the factors of production available to the economy. Everything else is just a movement along the existing frontier, a trade off between producing more of one good and less of another, not genuine growth.

Marginal, total, and average product

Three related measures describe how productive labor is at a given level of employment. The marginal product is the extra output generated by one additional worker, holding every other input constant. The total product is simply the sum of everyone's output, the economy's or firm's overall production. The average product divides that total by the number of workers employed, giving output per worker. These measures tend to move together only up to a point. The law of diminishing returns, which applies specifically in the short run when at least one input is fixed, states that as more of a variable input such as labor is added to a fixed input such as land or machinery, the marginal product of that variable input eventually declines. A small farm can absorb a few more workers productively, but beyond some point additional labor adds less and less, and eventually can add nothing at all.

A simple numerical example makes the pattern concrete. Suppose a firm with one fixed input, say a plot of land or a single workshop, hires an increasing number of workers one at a time.

WorkersMarginal productTotal productComment
15050 
23080Average product per worker is already falling, from 50 to 40
31090Diminishing returns clearly underway
4696 
54100 
6−496Total product itself starts to fall; the sixth worker is actively getting in the way
Workers employed (fixed capital) Total product +50 +30 +10 +6 +4 −4 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 25 50 75 100
Figure. The worked example from the text, plotted. Total product keeps rising through the fifth worker, but the labels, each worker's marginal product, show the increase getting smaller at every step, the law of diminishing returns in action, until the sixth worker actually pulls total product down.

Notice that marginal product falls from the very first additional worker onward in this particular example, a pattern that can also follow an initial phase of increasing returns, where the first few workers raise marginal product because specialization and division of labor let them work more efficiently together, before diminishing returns set in and marginal product starts to fall. Either way, once marginal product reaches zero, hiring an additional worker adds nothing to total output at all; economists call this point, and the underemployment just beyond it, disguised unemployment, a worker who is nominally employed but contributing nothing extra to production. This is exactly the kind of hidden slack that Lewis's dual sector model, described in the companion piece on classical theories of development, assumes exists in a developing economy's traditional agricultural sector, and that development strategy tries to draw on productively rather than leave idle.

More formally, a firm is an entity that transforms inputs, conventionally labor and capital, into output through a production technology, written as a production function, output as a function of labor and capital. The firm's objective is to maximize profit, revenue minus cost, and different technologies allow different degrees of substitution between labor and capital. In the long run, a firm can vary every input; in the short run, at least one input, typically capital, is fixed, which is exactly the condition under which the law of diminishing returns, illustrated in the table above, applies.

Measuring the cost of production

Costs split naturally into two categories. Fixed costs do not change with the quantity produced, rent on a factory, for instance, is owed whether the factory produces one unit or ten thousand. Variable costs do change with output, raw materials and hourly wages being the standard examples. Total cost is simply the sum of the two: total cost = total fixed cost + total variable cost.

Two further measures matter for decision making. Marginal cost is the increase in total cost that comes from producing one additional unit, the number a firm actually needs when deciding whether producing more is worthwhile. Average cost divides total cost by the quantity produced, giving the cost of a typical unit. Together, marginal and average cost are what connect the abstract idea of a production function to the very practical question every firm, and every government weighing an investment in infrastructure or education, eventually has to answer: is producing one more unit, educating one more student, vaccinating one more child, worth what it costs?

Sources: “A Framework for Analysis,” following M. P. Todaro and S. C. Smith, Economic Development (Pearson), and standard microeconomic treatments of production functions and the law of diminishing returns.

Keywords: production function marginal and average product law of diminishing returns fixed and variable costs production possibility frontier marginal cost